The one year game develpoment duel
Sep

3

2014

More Difficult Than Expected

This post is a status update, which is how I track progress specific to my game. Check out my timeline to see what I've recently accomplished.

    Key Events
  • Changing core game ideas.
  • Confidence shot.

The past two weeks have been a real shot to my confidence. It turns out that a perfect game does not live inside of my head. Instead, a game with real usability, budget, and gameplay issues lives in my head. Researching some of the questions I needed answers for last week revealed that there isn’t always a perfect solution, and that my game idea needs refinement.

As always, you can watch the video version of this post, or read the content below it.

This all started when I showed Chris my demo and he asked a valid question.

How will users tell what level their tower is at a glance?

I pointed out that the flags appearance change as you level up, so the user should be able to keep tabs on it. Fair point, right? Except, when you leave the flags on the map as the level progresses, things start to look really chaotic.

Screen Shot 2014-08-19 at 4.52.11 PM

As you can see, everything is competing for attention. Have a look at how much cleaner it becomes when we remove the flags and environmental noise after a unit has been purchased.

Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 3.10.01 PM

Much easier to parse what’s going on. Problem is, the flags and environmental changes are supposed to be the identifiers. Without them, there is no level progression. Argh! With that in mind, I thought it would be a good idea to try to use materials to show level. Wood for level 1, stone for level 2, and marble for level 3. You can see that concept here:

foothills_D_test_01

And while that somewhat solves the problem, it would take up 35% of my illustrators time on every map. That’s just not an acceptable solution. So, in summary, the complete list of problems with my approach were:

  • Archers and mages weren’t able to spawn at the same spots, which limited gameplay.
  • Memory usage was way too high since the environment changes stuck around as you progressed.
  • Everything was competing for attention via color.
  • No visual /at a glance indicator to recognize somethings level.
  • No cool factor — towers and units didn’t give off that awesome feeling of being upgraded.

Really, the solution to a lot of my problems is to follow the path already paved by the other tower defense games out there. Static towers, fixed with paths, etc. That just doesn’t excite me.

It’s Pivot Time!

Because of my desire to bring something new and immersive, I just can’t move forward with the tower defense genre. Instead, I’m going to slightly change to a castle defense sort of game. Same scope, perspective and art. Instead of upgrading towers, you’ll be managing units. There will be the occasional tower on the map that you try to defend / hold to get its benefits, but that’s it. Trust me, it’s really cool in my head.

7 of you did not hold your tongue!
  1. […] that my idea of a unique tower defense game just doesn’t work when the real art is applied. I wrote about specifics earlier. While I did learn quite a bit about game programming in the 4 months leading up to that, […]

  2. […] I realized my game wouldn’t become the straightforward tower defense game that I had in mind, the map had to slightly change as well. The map will now pan on an iPad and […]

  3. So one question I’ve been having about your game is are the units you control stationary? Or are you going to control their movement?

    • Was going to be static, but it looks like that’s one of the things I’ll be changing. Working on a demo for just that right now.

      • Making units movable might have some difficult implications on touch devices though. RTS games are way easier with a mouse. Have you seen any successful iOS RTS games?

        • There is a super cool game called warlords that has the best squad movement I’ve seen on iOS. Plan to take some inspiration there.

      • Yeah I think that would be a super welcomed change to the genre. If you made it kind of like an RTS/tower defense hybrid. If certain towers are overtaken, you can’t build any more of that unit, etc. One game mechanic I always like to throw out there for games like this, is maybe you could have a unit in place(like a demon of some sort) that a player can spawn if they sacrifice a certain number/type of unit.


Speak freely